Let me just say, as I was finding my way in the world of all things church and theology, I came through the evangelical movement called the Emerging Church. This was a focus among Christian leaders to incorporate a wider view of things theological and a broader approach that is inviting of the unchurched. As you probably know, I came through that-finding a home in the liturgical tradition. Rob Bell is a leader in the Emerging Church and pastors a church in Michigan.
"Love Wins" is getting a lot of press because Bell supposes that there is little reason for consideration of an eternal hell. His thoughts keep coming back to a God whose "steadfast love endures forever" whose "anger lasts for a moment but compassion for a lifetime." Amid many references to the Hebrew texts as well as the words of Jesus and Paul, he refutes the idea of an eternal hell based on the concept of a loving God whose love "would melt the hardest of hearts" given time. While refusing to be referred to as a universalist, this is universalist theology clearly.
Bell makes the point that there are few mentions of a literal hell and thus lists them in his book and explains their historical context. While this was a good idea, he leaves out several common references to hell in Paul's letters including the haunting picture in 2 Thess. 1. I understand what he was doing and the point he makes. It is certainly not in the orthodox stream of Christian theology.
Making references to the Bible, he also refers to some of the Church Fathers, one being Origen whose theology of hell has not been accepted by the wider Church. He also suggests reading C. S. Lewis' "The Great Divorce" for further reading on the subject, but fails to mention Lewis' "The Problem of Pain" which discusses openly Lewis' perspective on hell.
The point is (according to Bell)... Our God, who IS love will love you unconditionally unless you make the wrong choice in which he will send you to an eternal consciousness of torment with no chance to "repent." Put this way, I would also question this God of love. It was in this way that "Love Wins" was a good chance for me to question some things.
I don't know where I am on the whole hell thing. I am not sure that a Christian who doesn't believe in hell should be considered a "non-Christian." I do recognize that hell is a part of main-stream theology. I also know that Jesus wasn't really referring to hell in a lot of his stories. Another thing-- Hell is a great conversion tool as used by the Church in the middle-ages and even today.
One BIG BIG mistake in life is to make the here and now about heaven or hell later. This was not the way of life for Jesus. One thing about Jesus was that he lived "in the moment." Christ calls us to live in the moment... as Paul says, "redeeming the time, for the days are evil." Life is too short to make it all about something that is later. YES! One day we can live in the resurrection glory of Christ face to face, but let's live in this glory now... giving it "away" to all that come our way.
This isn't a critical review of Bell's book. It was a decent book with good points. Don't buy it though. It's too expensive. Take a couple of hours and go to the bookstore and read it. It will be good for you and fun to get out of the house and do something different. Be careful in reading it though. He needs a fact checker. He takes some verses out of context and misquotes some passages. This isn't a book that I would quote regularly, let's just say. Also, take it for what it is. It is not meant to be a dense treatise on things theological, it is rather one man's collected thoughts based on his understanding of scripture and his relationships with others.
Pass on the resurrection glory of Christ!